Who Would You Fight for in 1066?
It’s the year 1066. Edward, the King of England, has just died. Edward named his successor as Harold Godwinson, but Edward’s cousin, Duke William of Normandy, claims the king had promised him the crown. As William plans to invade England, there is another invasion brewing to claim the throne - led by Harald Hardrada, the King of Norway. It’s a time of turmoil, betrayal and bloodshed… who would you fight for?
Who Would You Fight for in 1066?
Harold Godwinson (The English)
Duke William (The Normans)
Harald Hardrada (The Vikings)
Do you tend to follow or rebel against rules?
I usually follow rules
I only follow the rules I think apply to me
I think rules are optional
What do you believe is the best way to choose a leader?
Through nomination by your peers
In a strategic discussion between political powers
On the battlefield
What is the most important part of the armor you would wear into battle?
Shield
Chainmail
I don’t need armor
What would be your weapon of choice in battle?
An axe
A bow and arrow
A sword
What personal style do you think is most attractive?
Moustache and mid-length hair
Clean-shaven with cropped hair
A well-groomed beard and thick hair
What group of people do you gravitate toward?
People who are well-liked and confident
People who are controversial - you either love ‘em or hate ‘em
People who have a wild streak
What makes you most upset?
People who are dishonest
People who underestimate me
People who won’t give me what I want
How are you more likely to fight in battle?
On foot
By Horseback
By sea
What is a fault you struggle with?
I’m overconfident
I hold grudges
I’m too proud
Do you think public opinion of leaders is important?
Yes
Sometimes
No
Related articles and products
1066: A Timeline of the Norman Conquest
Tostig and his consequences
Medieval Warfare Special: 1066 - The Battle of Hastings
The Battle of Hastings, according to Anonymous of Béthune
Too tired to fight? Harold Godwinson’s Saxon army on the march in 1066